國際法上 刑事執行管轄權 行使의 補完制度에 관한 硏究
- Author(s)
- 박세용
- Issued Date
- 2009
- Abstract
- The legislation jurisdiction and execution jurisdiction of the nation encounter to a territory limit in compliance with the principle of sovereignty right respect in terms of the international law. Namely, although the nation justly could have the legislation jurisdiction which can establish a norm to rule a definite case- occurrence?modification?extinction within domestic territory, offshore legislation jurisdiction in order to rule a fixed case outside of a territory is not recognized in principle.
Meanwhile, the sovereign state could have the territorial right that can enforce its own legislated law within domestic territory, but it is impossible to exercise a criminal execution jurisdiction in foreign nation in order to apply the domestic legislated law without consent of the foreign nation. This is called the territorial limit of criminal execution jurisdiction. Like this the territorial limit of criminal execution jurisdiction could divide in territorial inner limit and territorial outer limit. The territorial inner limit is the privilege and exemption of a diplomatic ambassador in the native country or a consul and the exemption of criminal execution jurisdiction foreign troops stationed in its own country. As for the territorial outer limit, in fact, it is impossible to investigate, collect evidence, arrest and punish the fugitive criminal who commits a crime and escapes overseas, the native people who commits a crime from the foreign nation and the foreigner who commits a crime toward(against) the native people. The territorial limit of criminal execution jurisdiction will be against(oppose) not only 'Crimes must be suppressed in common profit of civilized nation but also in principle of justice.
Namely, the nation commits a crime from the territorial waters and * the connection waters the exclusive economic zone(EEZ) the continental shelf as a matter of the home country about the vessel of the foreign nation which escapes in the high seas as a matter of `high seas as a matter of the low of anti line about the vessel jurisdiction is to soup and the second lieutenant soup attention inland based on circle which gives will be able to punish the territory jurisdiction the logic is as expected being legitimate, is to become problem. And in case the nation is not able to punish the fugitive criminal who commits a crime and escapes overseas because of the limit of territorial sovereignty, it will have a problem with how to relieve the infringed legal interest of the victim and the damaged nation. Also criminal execution jurisdiction problem of criminal execution jurisdiction and completely the issue which agrees is not but, in compliance with the territory main hoisting which predominates in adult main hoisting with edification of offenders direction of a ceremony return preparation isn't the problem must investigate from the criminal policy dimension which is thinks a tree architecture execution about the offender who is a in tree architecture from the foreign nation.
This paper is the purpose of setup the institutional frame to make up for the territorial outer limit of criminal execution jurisdiction for analyzes and take a triangular position a theory with crimes must be suppressed, comes true the common profit of civilizational empire and the human community, edification of the offender and the low of one morning is takes a triangular position a theory to favorable direction of a ceremony return.
which sees takes a triangular position, filling up the territory foreign enemy limit of criminal execution jurisdiction, the contents and a setup of eastern system principle of law the institutional frame for analyzes and take a triangular position a theory with crimes must be suppressed, comes true the common profit of civilizational empire and the human community, edification of the offender and the low of one morning is takes a triangular position a theory to favorable direction of a ceremony return.
- Alternative Title
- A study on the supplementary system of exercising of the criminal execution jurisdiction in the international law
- Alternative Author(s)
- Park, Sae Yong
- Affiliation
- 大學院 法學
- Department
- 일반대학원 법학과
- Advisor
- 朴容炫
- Awarded Date
- 2009-02
- Table Of Contents
- ABSTRACT
제1장 序論 = 1
제1절 硏究의 目的 = 1
제2절 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 = 2
제2장 刑事執行管轄權에 관한 一般理論 = 4
제1절 刑事執行管轄權의 槪念 = 4
제2절 刑事執行管轄權의 根據 = 6
Ⅰ. 領土管轄權 = 6
Ⅱ. 人的管轄權 = 8
Ⅲ. 保護的 管轄權 = 11
Ⅳ. 普遍的 管轄權 = 13
Ⅴ. 海洋法上의 追跡權 = 14
제3절 刑事執行管轄權의 國際法的 限界 = 16
Ⅰ. 刑事執行管轄權의 領土內的 限界 = 16
Ⅱ. 刑事執行管轄權의 領土外的 限界 = 24
Ⅲ. 領土外的 限界를 메우기 위한 國際的 努力 = 30
제3장 刑事執行管轄權의 域外適用制度 = 37
제1절 追跡權의 意義 = 37
제2절 追跡權의 要件 = 39
Ⅰ. 追跡船 = 40
Ⅱ. 被追跡權의 位置 = 41
Ⅲ. 合理的인 疑心 = 44
Ⅳ. 停船命令 = 45
Ⅴ. 繼續的 追跡 = 46
Ⅵ. 實力의 行使 = 48
제3절 追跡權의 終了 = 49
제4절 追跡權에 관한 事例의 檢討 = 50
Ⅰ. 유조선 Saiga호 事件 = 50
Ⅱ. 大韓民國 南海 반잠수정 浸透事例 = 54
제4장 犯罪人引渡制度 = 57
제1절 犯罪人引渡制度의 槪念 = 57
Ⅰ. 犯罪人引渡의 意義 = 57
Ⅱ. 犯罪人引渡制度의 沿革 = 58
Ⅲ. 犯罪人引渡制度의 基本原則 = 63
Ⅴ. 引渡義務 = 77
제2절 國際法上 犯罪人引渡制度의 形態 = 78
Ⅰ. 條約 = 78
Ⅱ. 變則的 犯罪人引渡 = 86
제3절 犯罪人引渡의 要件 = 91
Ⅰ. 主體에 관한 要件 = 92
Ⅱ. 客體에 관한 要件 = 93
Ⅲ. 引渡의 制限 = 96
제4절 犯罪人引渡節次 = 99
Ⅰ. 請求國의 犯罪人引渡의 要請 = 100
Ⅱ. 被請求國의 引渡節次 = 101
Ⅱ. 身柄引渡의 引繼, 引受 = 103
Ⅲ. 物件의 引渡 = 104
Ⅳ. 引渡후 請求國에서의 節次 = 105
제5절 우리나라의 犯罪人引渡體制 = 105
Ⅰ. 우리나라의 犯罪人引渡制度 = 105
Ⅱ. 우리나라의 犯罪人引渡條約 條約締結現況 = 107
Ⅲ. 犯罪人引渡法의 內容 = 108
제5장 受刑者移送制度 = 119
제1절 受刑者移送制度의 槪念 = 119
Ⅰ. 受刑者移送制度의 意義 = 119
Ⅱ. 受刑者移送制度의 發展 背景 = 121
Ⅲ. 受刑者移送制度의 基本原則 = 125
제2절 外國의 受刑者移送制度의 運營 現況 = 128
Ⅰ. 美國 = 129
Ⅱ. 英國 = 132
Ⅲ. 獨逸 = 134
Ⅳ. 프랑스 = 135
Ⅴ. 日本 = 136
제3절 Europe 受刑者移送協約 = 139
Ⅰ. 受刑者移送協約의 締結過程 및 背景 = 139
Ⅱ. 受刑者移送協約의 內容 = 141
제4절 우리나라의 國際受刑者移送法 = 147
Ⅰ. 制定經過 = 147
Ⅱ. 立法目的 = 148
Ⅲ. 條約前置主義 = 148
Ⅳ. 國內移送 = 149
Ⅴ. 國外移送 = 152
제6장 結論 = 157
參考文獻 = 160
- Degree
- Doctor
- Publisher
- 朝鮮大學校
- Citation
- 박세용. (2009). 國際法上 刑事執行管轄權 行使의 補完制度에 관한 硏究.
- Type
- Dissertation
- URI
- https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/8163
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000237474
-
Appears in Collections:
- General Graduate School > 4. Theses(Ph.D)
- Authorize & License
-
- AuthorizeOpen
- Embargo2009-02-04
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.