홈트레이닝의 운동몰입이 삶의 질과 신체적 자기효능감에 미치는 영향

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the effect that the exercise flow of hometraining has on quality of life by analyzing differences in quality of life, physical self-efficacy, exercise flow, and living satisfaction of participants. This study examines differences in quality of life, exercise flow, physical self-efficacy, and living satisfaction based on hometraining methods, which is convenient and approachable given the restrictions imposed due to Covid-19. Whether exercise flow through hometraining had any effect on quality of life and physical self-efficacy was also examined. The participants of this study were selected from a population of people who had experience with hometraining. A survey was carried out from September 1st, 2021 to October 30th, 2021 after explaining the aim of this study to the selected population. Due to the spread of Covid-19, the surveys were carried out online through Naver Office. A total of 204 survey responses were used as the sample of the study after deleting surveys with no responses, false responses, and unreliable responses. The survey used in this study was composed of 6 questions on background variables, 6 questions on quality of life, 10 questions on exercise flow, 9 questions on physical self-efficacy, and 9 questions on living satisfaction, a total of 40 questions. Each question was measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being ‘strongly disagree’, and 5 being ‘strongly agree’. The results are as follows. First, analysis of quality of life and physical self-efficacy based on demographic traits showed that exercise frequency had an effect on quality of life, with quality of life being highest when exercise frequency was 5 or more times a week. There were statistically significant differences in quality of life between participants who exercised 1~2 times a week, 3~4 times a week, and 5 or more times a week. Participation time also had an effect on quality of life, with statistically significant differences between participants who exercised over 1 hour each time, and participants who exercised under 1 hour each time. According to the physical self-efficacy comparison based on sex, males had significantly lower perceived physical abilities compared to females. When comparing physical self-efficacy based on purpose of exercise, perceived physical abilities were highest when participants were dieting. There were significant differences within purpose of exercise, such as increasing fitness, dieting, rehabilitation, and increasing muscle mass. Second, comparison of exercise flow based on sex showed that males had higher levels of behavioral commitment than females. Exercising 5 or more times a week was shown to have highest cognitive commitment based on exercise flow and frequency. There were statistically significant differences between those who exercised 1~2 times a week, 3~4 times a week, and 5 or more times a week. It was also shown that those who exercised 5 or more times a week had highest levels of behavioral commitment with statistically significant differences between those who exercised 1~2 times a week, 3~4 times a week, and 5 or more times a week. Those who exercised less than 1 hour at a time had lower cognitive commitment than those who exercised over 1 hour, with statistically significant differences. Those who exercised less than 1 hour at a time had lower behavioral commitment than those who exercised over 1 hour, with statistically significant differences. Those who exercised with the purpose of rehabilitation had highest levels of cognitive commitment, with statistically significant differences shown between purposes of increasing fitness, dieting, rehabilitation, and increasing muscle mass. Those who exercised with the purpose of rehabilitation showed highest levels of behavioral commitment as well, with statistically significant differences between purposes of increasing fitness, dieting, rehabilitation, and increasing muscle mass. Third, comparison of living satisfaction based on purpose of exercise showed that those who exercised with the purpose of rehabilitation were shown to have the highest levels of living satisfaction, with statistically significant differences shown between purposes of increasing fitness, dieting, rehabilitation, and increasing muscle mass. Fourth, cognitive commitment, a sub-factor of exercise flow, was shown to have a statistically significant influence on quality of life, and behavioral commitment was shown to have no statistically significant influence on quality of life. Fifth, cognitive commitment, a sub-factor of exercise commitment, was found to have an effect on physical self-efficacy, and behavioral commitment had no effect on physical self-efficacy. Based on these results, studies to be conducted in the future and direction of studies were suggested.