CHOSUN

AHP 기법을 활용한 중학교 컴퓨터 교육 개선을 위한 우선순위 연구

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
박용빈
Issued Date
2021
Keyword
중학교 컴퓨터교육, 컴퓨터교육, 우선순위, AHP
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to prioritize tasks to improve middle school computer education. To this end, necessary elements were derived from previous studies and the importance and priority of the improvement elements from the perspective of upper and lower aspects. For priority research, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is widely used as an objective decision-making method in various areas, was used. After deriving factors for improving computer education through literature review first, the researchers reconstructed some factors to suit the purpose of the study by reflecting expert opinions for computer education improvement. In addition, the opinions of experts were collected and categorized into the factors such as teacher’s aspects, textbook and software aspects, curriculum and education contents aspects, operational aspects, and policy aspects. The second layer is composed of sub-factors of each major factor in the first layer and a total of 20 evaluation indicators are found. Then the final model was confirmed after composing detailed elements for each factor. The survey was conducted on a total of 50 middle school teachers from August 15 to September 30, 2020, and 50 copies of survey responses were collected. 42 answers were used in the final analysis excluding 8 answers with low consistency and reliability. As a research analysis, priority was determined through Expert choice 11 analysis, and the main results are as follows.
First, the priority among the five top factors was found in the order of policy side, teacher side, operational side, curriculum and content side, and textbooks and software side.
Second, the subfactors under the teacher's aspects were organized in the order of composition of lecture plans to induce interest in the subject, reinforcement of education to use computers correctly, guidance to reduce gaming time and engage in healthy leisure activities, and the identification of computer addiction.
Third, looking at the sub-factors in terms of textbooks and software by priority, they were in the order of development of textbooks and learning tools tailored to users, provision of textbooks to conduct level-specific education, strengthening the development and dissemination of educational software, and dissemination of various multimedia learning materials such as digital textbooks and electronic textbooks.
Fourth, when looking at the sub-factors in terms of curriculum and educational content by priority, they were in the order of practice-oriented education, reinforcement of connection of learning content by grade, reinforcement of classes by level, and reinforcement of the curriculum for obtaining certification.
Fifth, when looking at the sub-factors in the operational aspects by priority, it was found in the order of securing enough time for classes more than a certain threshold, improving facilities and equipment, lightening the burden of teachers’ workload, and securing computer maintenance personnel.
Sixth, looking at the sub-factors in the policy aspects by priority, it was found to be in the order of strengthening support for the development of textbooks and learning tools, revising the curriculum from 2 years to 3 years, introducing programs from private training institutes, and expanding training opportunities for non-major students.
Lastly, when looking at the results of the final comprehensive priority, the first and second places were taken by the reinforcement of support for the development of textbooks and learning tools and the curriculum revision from two years to three years, which fall under the policy aspects. The 3rd and the 4th places were taken by the composition of lecture plans to induce interest and strengthening computer education so that they can utilize computers from the teachers’ aspects.
This study is meaningful in that it derived the priority that the previous studies have not presented to improve computer education in middle schools. It can also be said to be meaningful in that it suggested a way to maximize the middle school computer classes.
Alternative Title
A Priority Study on the Improvement of Computer Education in Middle School Using AHP Method
Alternative Author(s)
Yong Bin Park
Affiliation
조선대학교 교육대학원 정보.컴퓨터교육학과
Department
교육대학원 정보.컴퓨터교육
Advisor
김판구
Awarded Date
2021-02
Table Of Contents
ABSTRACT

I. 서 론 1
A. 연구의 배경과 목적 1
B. 연구의 내용과 구성 3

II. 이론적 배경 4
A. 컴퓨터 교육 4
1. 컴퓨터 교육의 개념 4
2. 컴퓨터 교육의 목적 및 필요성 5
B. 컴퓨터 교육의 목표 6
1. 중학교 6
2. 고등학교 10
C. 컴퓨터 교육현황 12
D. 정보·컴퓨터 교육과정의 변천 14
1. 제5차 교육과정 14
2. 제6차 교육과정 14
3. 제7차 교육과정 15
E. 해외 사례 16
1. 호주 16
2. 일본 17
3. 캐나다 18
4. 미국 19
5. 외국과 한국의 컴퓨터 교육과정 비교 21
F. 컴퓨터 교육의 문제점 22
1. 컴퓨터 교육 문제점 관련 연구 22
2. 컴퓨터 교육 발전 방안 관련 연구 24

Ⅲ. 연구방법 25
A. 계층적 의사결정방법론 25
1. AHP 개념과 특징 25
2. AHP 기본 공리 28
3. AHP 연구의 유효 표본 29
4. AHP 기법의 유용성과 한계 29
B. 연구절차 31
1. 연구모형 설계과정 31
2. AHP 기법 선정이유 32
3. 평가지표 설계 32
C. 연구모형 35
1. 분석도구 36
2. 설문 대상자 선정 및 조사방법 38
3. 설문 응답자 빈도분석 38

Ⅳ. 분석결과 41
A. 요인별 중요도 및 우선순위 분석 41
1. 상위측면 중요도 평가 41
2. 하위측면 중요도 평가 42
B. 전체 요인별 중요도와 우선순위 분석 47

V. 결론 51
A. 연구결과의 요약 51
B. 시사점 55
C. 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구 56

참고문헌 57

설 문 지 61
Degree
Master
Publisher
조선대학교 교육대학원
Citation
박용빈. (2021). AHP 기법을 활용한 중학교 컴퓨터 교육 개선을 위한 우선순위 연구.
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/16704
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000359398
Appears in Collections:
Education > 3. Theses(Master)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2021-02-25
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.