CHOSUN

기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 장애유형별 활용도

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
박재형
Issued Date
2014
Abstract
ABSTRACT


Utility of Middle School Art Textbook
in Basic Education Curriculum
according to Disability Categories


by Jai-Hyung Park
Advisor: Seunghee Lee, Ph.D.
Major in Special Education
Graduate School of Education
Chosun University


This study aims to conduct a research in the utility of middle school art textbooks in basic education curriculum according to different disability categories, so as to play a role of a professor or learning material when new art textbooks are produced in future. In accomplishing such an objective, the study was conducted with three research questions. First, what are the differences of the utility level of the standard middle school art textbooks’ art-experience activities per disability category? Second, what is the utility level of the standard middle school art textbooks' expressive activities per disability category? And third, what is the utility level of the standard middle school textbooks’ appreciating activities per disability category?
In order to carry out the study, one school was selected per each disability category(visual, auditory, mental, physical, and autistic disabilities) among the ten special-education schools that are located in P city, and a questionnaire was given to two of each school’s art teachers. Per each disability category, the two teachers were separated into A and B, where the responses from the A group were used for data analysis for the research while those from B were used for calculating the confidence level. Since there were no special schools for emotional disability in P city, a special school for mental retardation was selected to send out the questionnaire for autism.
The research result can be summarized as follows.
First, the utility level of standard middle-school art textbook’s art experiencing activity ranked the highest in hearing disability(M=2.54), followed by autistic disability(M=2.23), physical disability(M=2.09), and mental retardation(M=2.06). Since all the results were above average utility(M=2.06), the utility level can be seen as high. However, the utility level for the category of visual impairment (M=1.49) is observed to be extremely low. Therefore, it is necessary to produce textbooks that are appropriate for use from the visual disability category.
Secondly, the utility level of standard middle-school art textbooks’ expressive activities showed that each disability category turned out greater than or near the average utility level. Such a result shows that art textbooks are useful for all disability categories.
Thirdly, the utility level of standard middle-school art textbooks’ appreciating activity showed a relatively low figure for all disability categories. Although there are reasons such as factors involving education environment, understanding of the textbook’s different sections and the characteristics of the disability types, there is a profound need for study of the textbook content for raising the utility level in the appreciative field.
Looking at the results of the utility level of the standard middle-school art textbook per disability category, hearing disability(M=2.37) was the highest, followed in order by physical disability(M=2.12), mental disability(M=2.03), and autistic disability(M=2.02), but the utility of visual disability category exhibited a noticeably low level.
In this study, visual disability showed the lowest figures in all areas of the textbook that failed to reach the average of the other disability categories, and overall, the utility of appreciative activities recorded the lowest level. In the study of Jo-Min-Young(2010) and Han-Song-Yi(2011), art teachers focus more on drawing and making as their educational content, while emphasizing less on the area of appreciation. According to a study by Kwon-Hye-Won(2012), the area of appreciating was proportionally smaller than the other areas of artistic experience activity and expressive areas, while the composition was not sufficiently inter-related, which made education in appreciation ineffective. Therefore, this study has confirmed the necessity for the development of artistic textbooks that are in congruence with previous studies as well as appropriate for visual disability category.
Alternative Title
Utility of Middle School Art Textbook in Basic Education Curriculum according to Disability Categories
Alternative Author(s)
Utility of Middle School Art Textbook in Basic Education Curriculum according to Disability Categories
Affiliation
교육대학원 특수교육전공
Department
교육대학원 특수교육
Advisor
이승희
Table Of Contents
목 차

표목차 v

ABSTRACT vi

Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
2. 연구문제 4
3. 용어의 정의 4

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 9
1. 미술교육의 의의 9
2. 장애학생의 미술교육의 중요성 9
3. 장애학생 미술교육의 현황 11
4. 특수학교 미술교육의 현황 13
1)시각장애 특수학교의 미술교육 13
2)청각장애 특수학교의 미술교육 14
3)정신지체 및 정서장애 특수학교의 미술교육 14
4)지체장애 특수학교의 미술교육 15
5. 관련 선행연구 16
1) 교육환경 16
2) 미술교과서 영역 18
3) 장애유형 20

Ⅲ. 연구방법 22
1. 연구설계 22
2. 연구대상 22
3. 연구도구 23
1) 기초사항 24
2) 미술교과서 활용도 24
4. 연구절차 26
5. 자료분석 26
1) 응답자간 신뢰도 26
2) 미술교과서의 활용도 28

Ⅳ. 연구결과 29
1. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 미적체험활동에 대한
장애유형별 활용도 차이 분석 32
1) 교과서 개발 방향 32
2) 내용의 선정과 조직 32
3) 내용의 수준과 범위 32
4) 미적체험활동의 장애유형별 활용도 차이 33
2. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 표현활동에 대한
장애유형별 활용도 차이 분석 33
1) 교과서 개발 방향 33
2) 내용의 선정과 조직 33
3) 내용의 수준과 범위 34
4) 표현활동의 장애유형별 활용도 차이 34
3. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서 감상활동에 대한
장애유형별 활용도 차이 분석 34
1) 교과서 개발 방향 34
2) 내용의 선정과 조직 35
3) 내용의 수준과 범위 35
4) 감상활동의 장애유형별 활용도 차이 35
4. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 장애유형별 활용도
차이 분석 35

Ⅴ. 논의 37
1. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 미적체험활동에
대한 장애유형별 활용도 차이 37
1) 교과서 개발 방향 37
2) 내용의 선정과 조직 38
3) 내용의 수준과 범위 39
4) 미적체험활동의 장애유형별 활용도 차이 39
2. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 표현활동에 대한
장애유형별 활용도 차이 40
1) 교과서 개발 방향 40
2) 내용의 선정과 조직 40
3) 내용의 수준과 범위 41
4) 표현활동의 장애유형별 활용도 차이 42

3. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 감상활동에 대한
장애유형별 활용도 차이 42
1) 교과서 개발 방향 42
2) 내용의 선정과 조직 43
3) 내용의 수준과 범위 43
4) 감상활동의 장애유형별 활용도 차이 44
4. 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서 장애유형별 활용도 차이 45

Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 47
1. 결론 47
2. 제언 48

참고문헌 50

부 록 54
질문지 55
원자료 및 평균 60
신뢰도 산출 70
Degree
Master
Publisher
조선대학교
Citation
박재형. (2014). 기본 교육과정 중학교 미술교과서의 장애유형별 활용도.
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/15716
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000264639
Appears in Collections:
Education > 3. Theses(Master)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2015-02-25
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.