검도 수련생들의 도장 선택요인이 만족도에 미치는 영향

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The influence of Selection Factors for Kum-do Gymnasiums to the Level of Satisfaction in Trainee

Kim Tae-HO Advisor : Prof. Myeong-soo, Jung Ph D. Major in Physical Education Graduate School of Education, Chosun University

This research is for establishing attributes of satisfaction on factors studio of Kum-do trainees. The purpose of this research is to give an efficient management of Kum-do studios by analyzing about teaching type, education program, and facility program of issues of this research. The objects of the research are set and selected in elementary school, junior high school, high school, university students and ordinary trainee who are training at Kum-do studios located in G Metropolitan City, M City, S City, Y City, G County, G County, J County, Y County, W County, H County in 2011, selected 292 research sheets out of being omitted and insincerity in the research sheets and statistics package, SPSS version 12.0K was used. Frequency analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, independent t-test and one-way ANOVA are used as a statistics technique. These are the most important results by analysis that we have is as in the following. First, there was no difference in a statistics on difference analysis by gender. Second, difference analysis on students, there were some different results on giving order, variety of training methods, ability, mind and confidence, there were some differences with Junior/high school and university / ordinary trainee on the order in lower part of teaching technique, on the variety of training methods, there were some differences with elementary students and university students/ordinary trainee. Mind and giving confidence on the lower part of trainer’s technique, there were differences with Junior/high school students and university students/ ordinary trainee. Third, difference analysis on different levels, there were some differences on variety of training methods, variety training methods on the lower part of teaching technique, there were differences with a group of ‘first rank’ and ‘more than second rank’, ability on the lower part of trainer’s technique, there were some differences with a group of ‘first rank and ‘more than second rank’. Fourth, difference analysis on period of training, there were some differences with ability, ability on the lower part of trainer’s technique, there were some differences with a group of ‘ less than a year’ and ‘2~3 years’.