수영지도자의 행동유형이 회원들의 의사결정에 미치는 영향

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide a basic material to explore desirable teaching methods to satisfy leisure sports participants by finding out the effects of the behavior pattern of swimming coach on member' decision making and analyzing the function and role of swimming coach. To achieve this, members for 13 public or private swimming pools at five wards in G metropolitan city were selected as a population. Subjects were chosen using stratified cluster random sampling. Materials were collected by questionnaire survey and poor and unreliable responses were omitted. To analyze selected materials, one-way ANOVA, multiple correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were conducted using SPSS11.0 program. In this way, the following results were obtained. 1. In subjects' swimming pattern, participation period was more than one year, a participation day per week was more than five days, and a purpose to participation was mostly to promote health. 2. In the comparison of swimming coach's behavior pattern, there was statistically significance difference in qualification for gender; in teaching ability for age; in personality for teaching level; in teaching and facilities management for monthly income and in personality, qualification, exercise capacity, and facilities management(p< .05). In the comparison of swimming coach's behavior pattern by participation type, there was statistically significant difference in teaching ability(p< .05) and facilities management(p< .01) for participation career and personality(p< .05), qualification(p< .01), and teaching method(p< .05) for a purpose to participate. 3. In comparison of swimming coach's expected behavior pattern according to demographic characteristics, there was statistically significance difference in personality for age and in personality(p< .05) and teaching method(p< .05) for teaching level. In comparison of swimming coach's expected behavior pattern according to participation pattern, there was significance difference in qualification for participation period and in coaches' exercise capacity(p< .05) and facilities management(p< .05) for a purpose to participation. 4. In comparison of satisfaction by swimming coach's behavior pattern according to demographic characteristics, there was significance difference in facilities management(p< .05) and personality(p< .05) for gender; teaching ability(p< .05) for teaching level and in facilities management(p< .001) and teaching ability(p< .05) for job. In comparison of satisfaction by participation pattern, there was statistically significant difference in facilities management(p< .001), personality(p< .05), and teaching method(p< .05) for participation period: as participation period was shorter, facilities satisfaction became higher. In comparison of satisfaction by a purpose to participate, there was significant difference in facilities management and teaching ability. 5. In correlation analysis of swimming coach's behavior pattern, there was statistically significant difference in qualification and teaching method for personality factor and in teaching method and facilities management for qualification factor(p< .001). 6. In multiple regression analysis of reusing by swimming coach's behavior pattern, there was statistically significant difference in coach's qualification, coach's teaching method, and facilities management, but no statistically significant difference in coach's personality for factors influencing member's mind on reusing.