대학생의 경조성 성향과 경계선 성향에 따른 군집유형과 정서반응성 및 대인관계 유능성의 차이

Metadata Downloads
Issued Date
This study investigates the adaptative characteristics of hypomanic personality compared to borderline personality. This defines what sorts of clusters are composed in accordance with the tendencies towards hypomanic personality and borderline personality and verifies the differences of emotional reactivity and interpersonal competence between clusters. Participants include 512 university students in Gwangju and Jeollanam Do. They answered a questionnaire under a guidance with purpose of this study informed. Data were analysed by SPSS 21.0 and k-means cluster analysis verified four types of clusters: hypomanic-dominant, borderline-dominant, intermixed, and average. One-way ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc were conducted.
As the results, intermixed group shows the highest emotional reactivity and average group shows the lowest. Emotional reactivity of borderline-dominant group appears higher than that of hypomanic-dominant group. Interpersonal competence is the highest in hypomanic-dominant group and the lowest in the borderline-dominant group. Counseling university students who have hypomanic tendency could refer to this findings.
Alternative Title
Clusters of Hypomanic personality tendencies and borderline personality tendencies, and difference of emotional reactivity and interpersonal competence
Alternative Author(s)
kim So Hee
조선대학교 일반대학원
일반대학원 상담심리학과
Awarded Date
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 서론
A. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 ················· 1
B. 연구문제 및 가설···················· 6

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
A. 경조성 성격
1. 양극성 장애에서의 경조증··············· 7
2. 경조성 성격의 특징·················· 8
3. 양극성 장애의 동반이환················ 9
B. 경계선 성격
1. 경계선 성격장애 ·················· 11
2. 경계선 성격의 특징················· 12
3. 경조성 성격과 경계선 성격·············· 14
C. 정서반응성의 개념 및 특징················15
D . 대인관계 유능성의 개념 및 특징·············16

Ⅲ. 연구 방법
A. 연구 대상 ······················ 19
B. 측정 도구 ······················ 21
1. 경조성 성격 척도 ·················· 21
2. 경계선 성격 척도 ·················· 22
3. 정서반응성 척도 ·················· 23
4. 대인관계 유능성 척도 ················ 24
C. 자료 분석 ······················ 25

Ⅳ. 연구 결과
1. 주요 변인들의 기술통계치 및 상관관계········ 26
1) 주요 변인들의 기술통계치 ············· 26
2) 주요 변인들의 상관관계 ·············· 27
2. 경조성 성향과 경계선 성향의 군집분석 결과 ····· 29
1) 경조성 성향과 경계선 성향의 군집유형 ······· 29
2) 인구학적 배경에 따른 군집유형 차이 ········ 31
3. 군집유형 집단 간 차이 비교 ············· 32
1) 군집유형 간의 정서반응성 차이··········· 32
2) 군집유형 간의 대인관계 유능성 차이 ········ 34

Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의 ····················· 37

참 고 문 헌 ······················· 43
부 록 ·························· 54
조선대학교 대학원
김소희. (2016). 대학생의 경조성 성향과 경계선 성향에 따른 군집유형과 정서반응성 및 대인관계 유능성의 차이.
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > 3. Theses(Master)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2017-02-21
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.