CHOSUN

제주도지역 보호관찰청소년의 가족건강성, 학교적응성, 자아탄력성과 정서행동문제 간의 관계 분석

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
민윤희
Issued Date
2015
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore ways of effectively improving the externalized and internalized maladaptive behaviours of adolescents on probation by focusing on their personal strengths and temperament. This study seeks to find ways of promoting subjective well-being and improving the maladaptive behaviours of adolescents on probation. To this end, personal strengths intervention is used based on the standpoint of striving for a positive emotional behaviour state.
Moreover, this study examined the relationships between externalized and internalized maladaptive behaviours of adolescents on probation and analysed the correlations among family strength, school adaptation, ego resilience, and the adolescents’ emotional/behavioural problems. The influence of family strength and school adaptation, with ego resilience as a mediator, on emotional/behavioural problems was investigated to reveal indirect/direct effects and structural causality among emotional/ behavioural problems.
Based on the objectives and necessity of this study as mentioned above, the following research questions were established.
First, how severe are the emotional/behavioural problems of adolescents on probation?
Second, what are the clinical classifications for these emotional/ behavioural problems?
Third, are there differences among family strength, school adaptation, and ego resilience according to these clinical classifications?
Finally, how do family strength and school adaptation, influence emotional/ behaviour problems in adolescents on probation, using ego resilience as a mediator?
The survey data were collected using a questionnaire survey administered to adolescents reporting to Jeju city’s only probation office. Approximately 360 out of 700 adolescents aged 13 to 19 years old, who were under the supervision and monitoring of the Jeju probation office, were surveyed. A total of 346 questionnaires were returned out of the 360 that were distributed, and 39 of these were excluded on the basis of being partially or insincerely answered. A total of 307 questionnaires was used for the final analysis. The collected data were analysed with SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 20.0 using differential calculus. The study results are as follows.
First, how severe are the emotional/behavioural problems of adolescents on probation?
As for externalized behavioural problems, violation of probation requirements had the highest degree of severity, and externalized problems showed higher degree of severity compared to internalized behavioural problems. Adolescents with externalizing problems can be described as having a strong desire for recognition, and this suggests that externalized behavioural problems are related to the aggressive behavioural problems of adolescents on probation that occur because of attachment issues with their family members.
In terms of the severity of emotional/behavioural problems in adolescents on probation, the total of all the behavioural problems showed a high degree of severity, and the externalized problems showed an even higher degree of severity than the total behaviour problems. As for the sub-factor, probation violation showed the highest degree of severity in terms of problems.
Internalized problems showed lower degrees of severity compared to the externalized problems and anxiety/depression, shrinkage/depression as sub-factors of internalized problems showed lower degrees.
In sum, depression appeared to have little influence on the total problematic behaviours and externalized problems such as violation of probation and cognitive distortions are the highest causative of emotional/ behavioural problems in adolescents on probation whereas cognitive problems, aggressive behaviours, and social immaturity have an effect on the total problematic behaviours.
Second, what are the clinical classifications for these emotional /behavioural problems?
In this study, the externalized behaviour of probation violation showed a very strong correlation.
The study results showed internalized problems are influenced by cognitive distortions such as self-degradation, social immaturity, anxiety, depression and externalized problems are influenced by violation, and aggression.
Third, are there differences among family strength, school adaptation, and ego resilience according to these clinical classifications?
An F-test was performed with the K-YSR scale to examine the extent to which family strength, school adaptation, and the ego resilience of adolescents on probation influence the clinical types of emotional/ behavioural problems. Also pearson’s product moment correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between the measurement variables—family strength, school adaptation, and emotional/behavioural problems.
Recent studies have recognized that family strength is an important factor in adolescents on probation. Studies had shown that physical health is significantly correlated with psychological well-being. Family strength had significant relationships with anxiety/depression in previous studies, and the results of the present study are consistent with this finding. The path coefficient results, which represent causality between the factors of emotional/behavioural problems, showed that family strength has both direct and indirect effects.
In regards to the school adaptation differences of adolescents on probation, according to emotional/behavioural problem clinical type, adolescents on probation have a very difficult time adapting to school due to uncontrollable anger, aggressiveness, and various internalized problems that make them feel nervous, intimidated, and distracted. School maladjustment begins in childhood and, when it gains prominence, it takes a significant amount of time and effort to change the behaviour. Therefore, further studies are needed in order to investigate possible ways of resolving the maladaptation by focusing on personal vulnerability rather than an individual’s positive aspects.
There were significant differences of ego resilience both in externalization and in internalization, showing a negative correlation in reference to emotional/behavioural problems in ego resilience differences according to clinical categories for adolescents. Externalization appeared to be more frequent than internalization. Subtypes of emotional/behavioural problems are all inherent in adolescents; however, knowing which kind of problem is more prominent is crucial. If externalized problems are more prominent, violence will be more prominent, and if internalized problems are more prominent, related psychiatric problems will arise. This study shows that emotional/behavioural problems have direct negative effects on ego resilience. Emotional/behavioural problems display significant differences depending on their relationships with ego resilience.
Finally, how do family strength and school adaptation, influence emotional/ behaviour problems in adolescents on probation, using ego resilience as a mediator?
A validation examination was performed in order to assess the emotional/behavioural model’s goodness of fit, and a test was performed on the measurement model to examine whether it successfully measures latent variable of measurement factors. The estimates of structural paths were calculated from the study model of emotional/behavioural problems, and the measurement model path coefficient was also calculated in order to test the statistical feasibility of the latent factors of the emotional/ behavioural problems study model and the relationships of the correlation coefficients between latent factors. To speculate concerning the contributing factors that affect emotional/behavioural problems, the effects of path coefficients on emotional/behavioural problems, family strength, school adaptation, and the ego resilience measurement model were analysed, and the mediating effects of ego resilience were investigated to see if they had significance in terms of family strength, school adaptation, or emotional/behavioural problems.
The study results are certainly informative. Among family strength, school adaptation, and ego resilience according to internalized problem clinical types, family strength had the most significant differences, whereas ego resilience had the least significant differences. Similarly, family strength showed the most significant differences and school adaptation, showed the least among the externalized problem clinical types of family strength, school adaptation, and ego resilience. As for emotional/behavioural problems, family strength, school adaptation, and ego resilience were shown to be clinical issues. Such results suggest that family-related factors have the strongest influence on juvenile delinquents, causing them to be placed on probation and fall into clinical emotional/behavioural problems.
Accordingly, ego resilience showed a significant mediating effect on the paths of emotional/behavioural problems, family strength, and ego resilience. However, in terms of emotional/behavioural problems, neither paths of school adaptation, nor ego resilience showed any significant mediating effects.
In conclusion, this study showed that family strength, as the most significant influence on adolescents on probation, has negative correlations with their emotional/behavioural problems. This implies that an unhealthy family environment leads adolescents to grow up under great stress. Thus, family strength served as the main factor that leads to these adolescents being socially stigmatized. The estimates of structural paths indicate that a healthy family has a positive influence on ego resilience. However, in this study family interactions appeared to cause emotional problems, thus showing negative correlations with ego resilience.
Ego resilience has to do with individuals’ person characteristics; thus, if one’s relationship with their family is unhealthy, anger and impulsivity will arise. In this case, potential ego resilience may be less significant. Additionally, ego resilience plays a mediating role in the paths of family strength, ego resilience, and emotional/behavioural problems, but the mediating role of ego resilience was not significant for the paths of school adaptation, ego resilience, or emotional/behavioural problems. This suggests that the presence of healthy family relationships, loving parents, and caring will increase ego resilience and have positive influences on emotional/behavioural problems.

Key words: Adolescents on probation, Family strengths, School Adaptation, Analysis on the relationship between emotional/behavioural problems, Estimates of a study’s structural equation model, verifying the suitability of the emotional/behavioural problems measurement mode
Alternative Title
Analyses on Relationships among Family Srengths, School Adaptation, Ego Resilience, and Emotional/Behavioral Problems of Adolescents on Probation in Jeju
Alternative Author(s)
Min Yoon-Hee
Department
일반대학원 특수교육학과
Advisor
이승희
Awarded Date
2015-08
Table Of Contents
목 차
표목차 ⅳ
그림목차 ⅴ
ABSTRACT ⅵ

Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
2. 연구문제 8
3. 용어의 정의 9

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 11
1. 보호관찰청소년의 이해 11
1) 보호관찰의 개념 11
2) 보호관찰청소년의 개념 12
2. 정서행동문제 15
1) 정서행동문제의 개념 15
2) 정서행동문제의 분류 17
3) 정서행동문제의 원인 21
4) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 22
3. 가족건강성 27
1) 가족건강성의 개념 27
2) 가족건강성의 요인 28
3) 보호관찰청소년의 가족건강성 29
4. 학교적응성 32
1) 학교적응성의 개념 32
2) 학교적응성의 요인 32
3) 보호관찰청소년의 학교적응성 34
5. 자아탄력성 35
1) 자아탄력성의 개념 35
2) 자아탄력성의 요인 36
3) 보호관찰청소년의 자아탄력성 38
6. 청소년의 정서행동문제와 가족건강성, 학교적응성, 자아탄력성의 관계 40
1) 청소년의 정서행동문제와 가족건강성의 관계 40
2) 청소년의 정서행동문제와 학교적응성의 관계 42
3) 청소년의 정서행동문제와 자아탄력성의 관계 44

Ⅲ. 연구방법 49
1. 연구대상 49
2. 연구도구 50
1) 기초사항 50
2) 가족건강성 50
3) 학교적응성 51
4) 자아탄력성 52
5) 청소년 행동평가 53
3. 연구절차 54
4. 자료분석 55

Ⅳ. 연구결과 60
1. 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 정도 60
2. 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형 분석결과 61
3. 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 가족건강성
학교적응성, 자아탄력성의 차이 62
1) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 가족건강성의 차이 62
2) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 학교적응성의 차이 63
3) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 자아탄력성의 차이 63
4. 보호관찰청소년의 가족건강성과 학교적응이 자아탄력성을 매개로
정서행동에 미치는 영향 65
1) 측정변인들의 상관관계 65
2) 정서행동문제 연구모형의 적합도 검증 66
3) 정서행동문제 측정모형의 경로계수 적합도 검증 68
4) 정서행동문제 연구모형의 구조경로와 유효성 검증 70
5) 정서행동문제 연구모형의 효과 분해 71
6) 가족건강성과 학교적응성이 자아탄력성을 매개로 정서행동문제에
미치는 영향 73

Ⅴ. 논 의 76
1. 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제정도 76
2. 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형 79
3. 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 가족건강성
학교적응성, 자아탄력성의 차이 83
1) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 학교적응성의 차이 83
2) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 학교적응성의 차이 85
3) 보호관찰청소년의 정서행동문제 임상유형에 따른 자아탄력성의 차이 87
4. 보호관찰청소년의 가족건강성과 학교적응성이 자아탄력성을 매개로
정서행동문제에 미치는 영향 90
1) 가족건강성, 학교적응성, 자아탄력성과 정서행동문제 측정요인들의
상관관계 90
2) 자아탄력성을 매개로 가족건강성이 정서행동에 미치는 영향 91
3) 자아탄력성을 매개로 학교적응성이 정서행동에 미치는 영향 92
4) 가족건강성과 학교적응성이 정서행동문제에 미치는 영향에 있어서 자아
탄력성 매개효과의 차이 93

Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 95
1. 결 론 95
2. 제 언 100

 참고문헌 102

 부 록 125
Degree
Doctor
Publisher
조선대학교
Citation
민윤희. (2015). 제주도지역 보호관찰청소년의 가족건강성, 학교적응성, 자아탄력성과 정서행동문제 간의 관계 분석.
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/12549
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000265105
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > 4. Theses(Ph.D)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2015-08-25
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.