CHOSUN

중국과 한국기업회계제도의 비교연구

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
이몽
Issued Date
2009
Abstract
With the rapid economic development and changes, the international common accounting system has gradually come into being. Accounting Standard for Business Enterprises of the Republic of Korea by IMF is amended in line with the international accounting standards. After joining the WTO, China gradually becomes stronger. With the influence of economic market and under the auspices of macroeconomic regulation and control of Chinese government, international economic competition has not affected the change of the enterprises accounting system, while an accounting system converging to the international accounting standard is established.
Since 1992, after the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea, the economic exchanges between the two countries and mutual economic co-ordination, as well as the increasingly large amount of investment and trade result in intensive economic, political, and cultural contact. Therefore, in accordance with the differences of economic system and social environment between China and South Korea, accounting regulations, accounting methods, and accounting performance vary from each other. China and South Korea's educational activities are also frequent, so they attract a lot of investment activities. To solve this problem the mutual study of accounting between the two countries needs to be coordinated.
In this paper, firstly, the author will compare and analyze the developing process of both South Korea and China’s business accounting benchmarks and the problems that appear in the developing process, as well as the difference of it between the two countries. Secondly, through the comparison and analysis of the two countries’ business accounting benchmark, the author will carefully compare and analyze the differences between the two systems, and the differences between the financial statements as well as the basic elements of financial statements and key accounting diction of the terms.
As the trading volume between South Korea and China tends to increase, the two countries’ business accounting benchmarks are necessary to be adjusted to the international accounting standards.
It is concluded that the business accounting benchmarks of South Korea and China appears similar in the basic system, but great differences exist in the associated terminology and classification. Many things need to be adjusted in the establishment of the accounting benchmarks and the similar development processes as well as the economic systems. Therefore, with the increasing accounting personnel of the two countries, the people who want to understand the two countries’ accounting information need common research and more efforts.
Alternative Title
A comparative Study on the Accounting System in China and Korea
Alternative Author(s)
Li Meng
Affiliation
조선대학교 일반대학교
Department
일반대학원 회계학과
Advisor
박길영 교수님
Awarded Date
2009-08
Table Of Contents
목차

ABSTRACT

제1장 서론 1
제1절 연구 목적 1
제2절 연구의 방법과 구성 2

제2장 한국 회계기준의 발전과정 3
제1절 기업회계기준의 이론적 배경 4
제2절 회계기준의 형성과 발전과정 5
제3절 한국 기업회계기준의 문제점 8

제3장 중국 회계기준의 발전과정 9
제1절 중국의 회계기준 형성과 발전과정 10
제2절 중국회계기준의 특징 19
제3절 중국회계환경의 변화 21
제4절 중국 기업회계기준의 문제점 22

제4장 한국과 중국의 기업회계제도의 비교 26
제1절 한국과 중국기업회계기준의 발전과정상의 차이 26
제2절 기업회계제도의 체계 비교 28
제3절 재무제표의 체계 36
제4절 자산과 부채의 평가기준 비교 47
제5절 수익과 비용 인식기준의 비교 52
제6절 외화환산회계의 비교 57

제5장 결론 61

참고문헌 63


표목차

한국과 중국기업회계기준의 발전과정의 비교 26
한국기업회계기준의 체계 31
국제회계기준과 한ㆍ중 회계기준의 일반원칙 비교 35
한국과 중국의 대차대조표의 비교 37
한국과 중국의 손익계산서 비교 42
한국과 중국의 현금흐름표 비교 44
한국과 중국의 이익잉여금처분계산서(이윤분배표)비교 45
한국과 중국의 재무제표 종류의 비교 47
한국과 중국의 자산·부채의 평가 비교 51
한국과 중국의 수익·비용인식기준 비교 55
한국과 중국의 외화환산회계 비교 59
Degree
Master
Publisher
조선대학교 대학원
Citation
이몽. (2009). 중국과 한국기업회계제도의 비교연구.
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/8329
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000238461
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > 3. Theses(Master)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2009-08-04
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.