한국의 세이프가드제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구
- Author(s)
- 허봉
- Issued Date
- 2006
- Abstract
- Corresponds in GATT, the process trade log which agreement ideologys about lower it puts on the damage where the domestic industry of the importing country is serious with increase of the income, or, when being the worry which it will put on to, income of the eastern commodity about under restricting it will be able to protect a domestic industry in order at day and time, the emergency measure against the income of the specific commodity exceptionally in GATT 19th trillion about under regulation it permits. The tax which will reach does as safeguard management.
In agreement end of GATT conclusion of a treaty debt to country long period WTO about under founding it was an agreement of the various important matter whose GATT 19th mourning taxes are necessary to safeguard management exercising hour and the separate way which about under regulation complements the exercising process back at 1994 and 'the tax contracted safeguard agreement' (Agreement on Safeguards). The eastern agreement not only the various important matter which is necessary to exercising of management the control system after death dictionary about under preparing is providing in management misappropriation and the tax safeguard management as anti? dumping management exercising is not frequent it is not but recently protects a home country industry the developing country is showing the tendency where the tax application of safeguard system is magnified gradually in the center.
Namely, infinite competitive international normality the world?wide various nations home country industrial protection is revealing the attitude which will take a hazard tariff and an income other back material management and tax wave crest of safeguard management exercising the next tax will more be emphasized more highly that which time, than with the fact that importance of the safeguard. The report tax safeguard management exercising hour export from within limitations objectivity and process characteristic and transparent characteristic lacked that Korea domestic industrial protection hazard there is a necessity where the tax which is a confrontation management which is only against the process trade which GATT where it stands it permits will seek an office a safeguard management appropriately, in order there not to be possession of criticism and international dispute, the sun will do.
In order to attain a same objective with above the research which it sees as the general investigation the tax regarding a safeguard system from 2nd chapter tax the triangular position process and tax of safeguard system analyze legal setup of safeguard system and tax of advanced nation against a safeguard system.
And as analysis and the investigation the tax of Korea against a safeguard system and the problem point tax of Korea the setup of safeguard system and tax of Korea the safeguard institutional use instance back analysis after investigating, tax of Korea about under extracting analyze the problem point of safeguard system from 3rd chapter.
With above against the solution plan against a same problem point under presenting the man with underdeveloped genital organ it does the professionalism raising plan from 4th chapter in compliance with a characteristic security plan and the reorganization of the industrial damage relief agency at institutional improvement program, reliability and life of the use agency.
Synthesis it summarizes the result which from 5th chapter it investigates last from above and the tax of Korea confronts to the development of safeguard system and direction under presenting the man with underdeveloped genital organ.
With method of research result of the inside and outside of the country and the research report and announcement data and the various publication of the government authority and the research facility, analytical research and the tax which apply a book back literature data safeguard dispute instance it was in parallel and it researched.
- Alternative Title
- A Study on the Problems and Improvement for Korea's Safeguard System
- Alternative Author(s)
- Xu, Feng
- Affiliation
- 조선대학교 대학원
- Department
- 일반대학원 법학과
- Advisor
- 박용현
- Awarded Date
- 2007-02
- Table Of Contents
- 第1章 序論 = 1
第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
第2章 세이프가드制度에 관한 一般的 考察 = 4
第1節 세이프가드制度의 定立過程 = 4
Ⅰ. 세이프가드制度의 意義 = 4
Ⅱ. 세이프가드制度의 目的 = 5
Ⅲ. GATT 第19條 = 6
Ⅳ. UR세이프가드協定 = 7
第2節 세이프가드制度의 法的 體制 = 8
Ⅰ. 세이프가드措置의 發動要件 = 8
1. 輸入의 絶對的 또는 相對的 增加 = 8
2. 豫測하지 못한 事態의 發展 = 9
3. 國內産業에 대한 深刻한 被害 또는 被害의 威脅 = 10
(가) 同種製品 또는 直接競爭製品을 生産하는 國內産業 = 10
(나) 深刻한 被害 또는 被害의 威脅 = 12
4. 因果關係 = 13
Ⅱ. 세이프가드措置의 適用對象 = 13
Ⅲ. 세이프가드措置의 發動節次 = 14
1. 調査節次 = 14
(가) 産業被害調査의 申請 = 14
(나) 産業被害의 調査 = 15
(1)公開節次에 의한 調査 = 15
(2)客觀的 評價에 의한 調査 = 15
(다)秘密情報取扱 = 16
(라) 判定 = 16
2. 세이프가드 措置의 內容 = 17
(가)關稅率 調整 = 17
(나)輸入數量制限 = 17
(다)構造調整 措置 = 17
Ⅳ. 세이프가드 措置의 制限 = 18
1. 選別的 適用 = 18
2. 措置實行의 水準 = 19
3. 措置適用期間 = 19
4. 暫定措置 = 20
5. 再發動 = 20
6. 再檢討 및 期間延長 = 20
Ⅴ. 세이프가드 措置에 따른 義務, 補償 및 報復措置 = 21
1. WTO 通報 및 協議 = 21
2. 補償 및 報復措置 = 22
Ⅵ. 기타 세이프가드 措置 內容 = 22
1. 開發途上國에 대한 例外適用 = 22
2. 特定措置(灰色地帶措置)의 禁止 및 撤廢 = 23
第3節 先進國의 세이프가드制度 = 24
Ⅰ. 美國 = 24
1. 發動要件 = 24
2. 産業被害調査 申請 = 24
3. 産業被害調査 및 判定 = 25
4. 세이프가드措置 手段 = 26
5. 暫定措置 및 措置延長 = 27
6. 세이프가드措置에 따른 義務, 補償 및 報復措置 = 28
7. 기타 세이프가드措置 內容 = 28
Ⅱ. EU = 29
1. 發動要件 = 29
2. 産業被害調査 申請 = 30
3. 産業被害調査 및 判定 = 31
4. 세이프가드措置 手段 = 32
5. 暫定措置 및 措置延長 = 32
6. 세이프가드措置에 따른 義務, 補償 및 報復措置 = 33
7. 기타 세이프가드措置 內容 = 33
第3章 韓國의 세이프가드制度와 그 問題點 = 34
第1節 韓國의 세이프가드制度의 法的 體制 = 34
Ⅰ. 發動要件 = 34
Ⅱ. 産業被害調査 申請 = 35
Ⅲ. 産業被害調査ㆍ判定 = 36
Ⅳ. 세이프가드措置 手段 및 制限 = 37
Ⅴ. 세이프가드措置에 따른 義務, 補償 및 報復措置 = 39
第2節 韓國의 세이프가드制度 運用事例---韓ㆍ中마늘분쟁사례 = 39
Ⅰ. 韓ㆍ中마늘분쟁의 槪要 = 39
Ⅱ. 韓國의 세이프가드措置와 中國의 報復措置 = 40
1. 韓國의 主張과 法的根據 = 40
2. 中國의 主張과 法的根據 = 41
Ⅲ. 貿易委員會 判定 = 41
Ⅳ. 事例分析의 示唆點 = 42
第3節 韓國의 세이프가드制度의 問題點 = 43
Ⅰ. 세이프가드制度 運用方向上의 問題 = 43
1. 發動要件上 明瞭性의 不在 = 43
2. 關稅法과 對外貿易法에서의 分産 = 45
3. 彈力關稅에 따른 信賴性 疑惑 = 47
Ⅱ. 세이프가드制度 運用機關의 問題 = 48
1. 對外的인 信賴性 疑惑 = 48
2. 運用機關의 明瞭性 提高 = 48
Ⅲ. 産業被害救濟機關의 問題 = 48
1. 産業被害救濟機關의 二元化 必要性 = 48
2. 貿易委員會의 信賴性 提高 = 49
3. 貿易紛爭 專擔法院의 不在 = 51
第4章 韓國의 세이프가드制度의 改善方案 = 51
第1節 制度的인 改善方案 = 51
Ⅰ. 發動要件에 대한 구체적 規定의 明示 = 51
Ⅱ. 세이프가드制度에 대한 國內法上 統合運用의 必要 = 53
Ⅲ. 彈力關稅에 대한 信賴性 確保 = 56
Ⅳ. 構造調整計劃 提出의 義務化 = 58
Ⅴ. 再檢討 條項의 明確化 = 58
Ⅵ. 開發途上國 優待條項의 明文化 = 59
第2節 運用機關의 信賴性 및 明瞭性 確保方案 = 60
Ⅰ. 對外的인 信賴性 確保 = 60
Ⅱ. 運用機關의 효율적인 制度運用上의 明瞭性 確保 = 62
第3節 産業被害救濟機關의 改編에 의한 專門性 提高方案 = 63
Ⅰ. 産業被害救濟機關의 二元化에 대한 必要 = 63
Ⅱ. 貿易委員會의 地位格上과 專門性 提高 = 63
Ⅲ. 貿易事件 專擔法院 設置 = 64
第5章 結論 = 65
參考文獻 = 67
ABSTRACT = 70
- Degree
- Master
- Publisher
- 조선대학교 대학원
- Citation
- 허봉. (2006). 한국의 세이프가드제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구.
- Type
- Dissertation
- URI
- https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/6770
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000234265
-
Appears in Collections:
- General Graduate School > 3. Theses(Master)
- Authorize & License
-
- AuthorizeOpen
- Embargo2008-06-27
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.