구기종목유형에 따른 진로의사결정효능감과 진로결정유형, 진로결정수준의 관계

Abstract

This study is to identify the relationship among career decision-making efficacy, career decision type and career decision level according to sports type of high school players. To do this, I chose 1641 students by the multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling as the subject of study. I analyzed the causal relationship of the collected data using LISERL 8.12(Joerskong & Sorbon, 1977) based on a structural equation. In order to do a close analysis, I used descriptive statistics analysis, Analysis of Variance(ANOVA), and multiple regression analysis. Through this study, I came to the following conclusions. Firstly, there is a difference in career decision-making efficacy, career decision type and career decision level by the variable that is due to the background of the high school players. The career decision level of boy students shows higher than that of girl students in their problem-solving, goal choices and accurate self-evaluation. In a reasonable type, a sub-factor of their goal choices, information gathering about jobs, accurate self-evaluation and career decision type, they also show higher. High school players who have played over five years show higher than players who have barely played for a few years in an intuitive type of problem-solving and career decision types. Players who have already decided on the course to take after graduation show a high tendency in career decision-making efficacy, career decision type and career decision level, compared to players who haven‘t decided their course yet. Secondly, types of ball games have a meaningful influence upon their problem-solving, plans for their future and goal choices. The career decision-making efficacy of players in popular sports shows higher than that of players in unpopular sports, Thirdly, while types of ball games have a meaningful influence upon a dependent type of career decision types, they have little influence upon a reasonable type and an intuitive type. Players of popular sports show a high tendency in a dependent type and an intuitive type of career decision types, while those of unpopular sports show a high tendency in a reasonable one. In the fourth, types of ball games which players in high school play have a meaningful influence on the career decision level. The career decision level of players in popular sports shows higher than that of players in unpopular sports. As a result, because players in unpopular sports have little assurance of their own career, we should give them some chances which could make them a kind of assurance. In the fifth, considering the relationship between career decision-making efficacy and career decision type, I find out while a reasonable type has an influence upon problem solving and an accurate self-evaluation, an intuitive type has an influence upon problem solving, information gathering about jobs and an accurate self-evaluation. On the other hand, a dependent type has an influence upon a plan for the future and an accurate self-evaluation. In the sixth, I find out that the relationship between career decision-making efficacy and career decision type has a meaningful influence on problem-solving, a plan for the future and a goal choice. Finally, an indirect influence which types of ball games have upon career decision type and career decision level is more effective than a direct influence through career decision-making efficacy as a parameter. When we decide their career individually or by games as game types of players, we must first give priority to improve the career decision-making efficacy. By doing this, we can raise the career decision type and the career decision level.