CHOSUN

5.18광주민주화운동 기념행사의 문제점과 발전방안에 관한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
박지욱
Issued Date
2009
Abstract
At the point of view in 2009, in terms of institutional standard, ‘5·18’ can be a historical event almost completed its settlement at least. That means that through enactment of low for compensation of concerned people with Gwang-ju democratic uprising and practical compensation in 4 times, the regainment of impaired reputation and compensation related this event have been considerably finished, and the application of sufferer is still in progressing now. May 18th is set as national anniversary day, Mangwol-dong grave boundary is upgraded as national cemetery, and its victims became national merit man.
One obvious thing is local limitation of ‘5·18’ need to be distinguished from that of May uprising. While ‘5·18’ refers the event of 1980 itself, 5·18 Gwang-ju democratic uprising memorial ceremony is the common concept of national democratic uprising expanded through the medium of ‘5·18’ after 1980. ‘5·18’ is not just exist as the event occurred on May 1980, but also it is exist with re-interpretation through 5·18 Gwang-ju democratic uprising after that event. If there was no memorial ceremony, ‘5·18’ might be remained till now as another tragic historical event
Looking at one way, ‘5·18’ is the event occurred in Gwang-ju and some area of Jeonnam, isolated from other areas in terms of its organizing and emotion. While it is true that 'May uprising' has a little difference depends on it period, comparatively it is the event occurred in national-wide. Of course, it is true that there is emotional sense of distance between Gwang-ju Jeonam area and others in the course of May uprising. However, it is same uprising in terms of its assertion that insists succession of 5·18 spirit and punishment of slaughterer at that time of 1980.
After 1980, memorial ceremony have taken leading position of national democratic activities. It is a period when uprising force of each fields concentrated through May uprising, leads uprising against contradict structure of Korean society experienced from 5·18. If we define the uprising of this period in one word, it is denial uprising. In other words, it is the uprising deny authoritarianism political power and defy it instead of yield. Such type of uprising showed most uplifted appearance through June resistance in 1987.
Before and behind of 1990's, when compensation for suffered and memorial business is in progressing, differentiation inside memorial ceremony has been started. In the progress of ‘5·18’ and its concerned people changed from 'violent acts' and 'mob' to 'democratic uprising' and 'national merit man' respectively, May uprising also changed to various forms. This is because ‘5·18’ collective uprising and its memorial ceremony need to be reduced as individual event in compensation processing. After that, 5·18 Gwang-ju democratic uprising memorial ceremony still has taken important role for the march of history though, in fact in other aspect it also showed a many of negative forms under the name of May uprising. In addition, memorial ceremony is not presented away from actual social structure, nor ‘5·18’ concerned people cannot live as a 'warrior' for decades. In result, among the many appearances represented in the change processing of May uprising, both the factor to be succeed and developed, and the factor to be criticised are coexist.
After the ceremony to memorial ‘5·18’ is completely instituted and also finished most of memorial business, memorial ceremony looking forward new direction. It means that if we say memorial ceremony until 1980's was the denial of authoritarianism, current memorial ceremony where authoritarianism political power is disappeared is considered to newly make detail subject and type of democracy and human right inside our life(from negative political power to positive political power).
Based of this kind of view point, this study look into the memorial ceremony from immediately after the occurrence of Gwang-ju democratic uprising in 1980 till current time, and trying to consider problems and developmental Plan. And based on this, the purpose is to contribute in rising systemicity, compatibility and democracy of 5·18 Gwang-ju democratic uprising and its memorial ceremony.
Alternative Title
A Study on the Problems and Developmental Plan of May 18 Gwang-ju Democratic Uprising Memorial Ceremony
Alternative Author(s)
Park, Ji Wook
Department
교육대학원 일반사회교육
Advisor
이창헌
Awarded Date
2009-08
Table Of Contents
ABSTRACT ⅲ
제1장 서론 1
제1절 연구의 목적 1
제2절 이론적 배경 및 선행연구의 검토 3
제3절 연구의 범위 및 방법 9

제2장 5·18광주민주화운동의 배경과 전개과정 10
제1절 5·18광주민주화운동의 근원적 배경 10
1. 역사적 배경 10
2. 한국자본주의의 모순과 지역주의 11
3. 지식인과 청년층의 높은 민주의식 14
제2절 5·18광주민주화운동의 전개과정 16
1. 제1국면기 16
2. 제2국면기 18
3. 제3국면기 20
제3절 사건사로 본 5·18광주민주화운동의 특징 24
1. 비조직화된 대중들의 자발적인 저항 24
2. 국가폭력에 대한 부정, 자유를 향한 열정 24
3. 패배를 넘어선 민주화 열망 25

제3장 5·18광주민주화운동 기념행사의 성립과 발전 26
제1절 광주민주화운동 기념행사의 성립과 전개 26
1. 5월 단체의 현황 26
2. 광주민주화운동기념행사의 전개 27
1) 억압기 29
2) 투쟁기 37
3) 개화기 43
제2절 새로운 5월‘축제’의 개발 45
제3절 광주민주화운동 기념행사의 정치·사회적 의미 48

제4장 5·18광주민주화운동 기념행사의 문제점과 발전 방안 50
518광주민주화운동 기념행사의 문제점 50
1. 행사 내용의 연례적 답습 50
2. 행사의 산업화 전략 부재 51
3. 대중참여의 감소 52
제3절 5·18광주민주화운동 기념행사의 발전 방안 54
1. 한(恨)의 정서를 넘어선 축제의 형성 54
2. 전국화 방안의 모색 55
3. 5·18광주민주화운동정신과 인권문제와의 연계 57
4. 5월 단체의 역할 제고 58

제5장 결론 및 제언 62
참고문헌 68
Degree
Master
Publisher
조선대학교 교육대학원
Citation
박지욱. (2009). 5.18광주민주화운동 기념행사의 문제점과 발전방안에 관한 연구.
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/15116
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000238263
Appears in Collections:
Education > 3. Theses(Master)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2009-08-04
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.