하키지도자의 지도유형에 따른 선수만족의 관계

Abstract

Nowadays, coaches should be evaluated in various aspects other than training of players. Coaches are required to take more complicated and professional roles and responsibilities. With its vocational features, coaches meet with direct culture. Coaches can be further understood through thorough analysis in various directions, in addition to the role of training players. This study explores hockey players' satisfaction with their leaders' leadership styles, improve the relation between players and leaders, and further enhance players' skills and capacity which will lead to development of hockey. This study also analyzes influences of leaders' leadership styles upon their players, through looking into first, difference from hocky coaches' leadership styles according to demo-sociological features, second, difference from players' satisfaction with demo-sociological features, third, correlation between leadership styles and players' satisfaction and fourth, influences of leadership styles upon players' satisfaction. 64 hockey teams in secondary schools with a focus on hockey players enrolled in secondary school league in 2006 were chosen as samples of this survey. And survey targets were singled out through stratified cluster random sampling. The survey was made through questionnaire which contains four questions about players' personal attributes such as gender, affiliation, career, and game participations. Validity of the questions was verified through SPSS 13.0, and its primary factor analysis was made through Varimax. Only values of element analysis of 0.5 and more have been utilized as parameters for verifying the research theme. The infra-element of leadership styles have contained training, direction behavior, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, socially supported behavior, positively compensated behaviors. The result of element analysis has showed that leadership styles (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy = .6582, Bartlett Test of Sphericity = 592.457, p＜.00l) and players' satisfaction (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy = .7822, Bartlett Test of Sphericity = 513.232, p＜.00l) were statistically significant in validity and appropriateness. For data process, Window SPSS 13.0 was used along with frequency analysis in the demo-sociologic features. In order to examine leadership styles and players' satisfaction according to demo-sociological features, t-test and one-way ANOVA have been done. When there was a significance difference as a result of variable analysis, scheffe was used. Multiple Regression Analysis was carried out in order to analyze correlation between leaders' leadership styles and players' satisfaction, and influences of the styles upon players' satisfaction. Its significance level was set to a=.05. The results of verifying hypotheses based on the purpose and methods above show that the leadership styles have significant relation with players' physical performance and mental satisfaction, and have significant influences. Followings are results obtained through data analysis. 1. In the comparison of leaders' leadership according to demo-sociological elements, gender has statistical significance in both leadership styles and infra-elements. In the section of game participations and career, there was an significant difference in autocratic leadership style. 2. In the comparison of players' satisfaction according to demo-sociological elements, male players showed higher satisfaction in physical performance and mental satisfaction, and more frequent participating players showed higher satisfaction. In the section of career, more experienced players showed higher satisfaction. 3. In the analysis of correlation between players' physical performance and mental satisfaction with training direction, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, socially supported behavior, positively compensated behaviors, showed positive influence with statistically significant correlation. 4. The analysis of influences of leadership's styles upon players' satisfaction showed that training direction, democratic behavior, socially supported behavior, have statistically significant influence upon players' physical performance, and training direction, autocratic behavior, socially supported behavior, positively compensated behaviors have statistically significant influence upon players' mental satisfaction.