CHOSUN

동기적 차원의 강박증상에 따른 자기양가감과 사고-실재 융합의 차이: 비임상 집단을 중심으로

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
강수현
Issued Date
2016
Keyword
불완전감, 위험회피, 강박증상의 동기적 차원, 자기 양가감, 사고-실재 융합
Abstract
This study was to categorize obsessive-compulsive symptom into two subtypes based on motivational dimension. One of the two subtypes is 'incompleteness' group which is characterized by sense of incompleteness, not just right thinking and sens. The other subtype is 'harm avoidance' group. The most prominent motivation of this group is harm avoidance.
Among 311 20's, 15 subjects were selected from the top 5% of the each dimension of OC-TCDQ and 30 control group subjects were selected from the bottom 10% of the two dimension of OC-TCDQ. This study focused on the differences of self-ambivalence and thought-reality fusion according to obsessive-compulsive symptom subtype on motivational dimension. The degree of Self-ambivalence and thought-reality fusion were compared between in completeness group and harm avoidance group.
Results showed that incompleteness group scored significantly higher than both harm avoidance and control group on the self-ambivalence score. And harm avoidance group scored significantly higher than control group on the self-ambivalence score.
In addition, thought-reality fusion was compared across three groups. Harm avoidance group showed higher scores on thought-reality fusion measures compared to both completeness group and control group. Moreover, sub factors of thought-reality fusion were also compared across three groups. In this analysis, harm avoidance group showed higher scores only on thought-event fusion measures compared to both incompleteness group and control group. But there were no differences on the scores of thought-event fusion.
In summary, incompleteness group and harm avoidance group showed different pattern on the measures of self-ambivalence and thought-reality fusion. The results of this study support the two-dimensional model of OCD and suggested that more valid classifying criterion of OCD could be based on motivational dimensions. Therefore, Implications of this study for treatment is that in treating OCD patients clinicians should consider the motivational trait and be included in cognitive therapy. Finally, the significance and limitations of this study were discussed.
Alternative Title
Difference of Self-Ambivalence and Thought-Reality Fusion according to Obsessive-compulsive symptom type on motivative dimension : using nonclinical group
Alternative Author(s)
kang, soo hyun
Affiliation
조선대학교 일반대학원
Department
일반대학원 상담심리학과
Advisor
정승아
Awarded Date
2017-02
Table Of Contents
제1장. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 ··········································1

제 2장. 이론적 배경 ···························································5
제 1절. 강박장애와 불완전감 ··········································5
제 2절. 자기 양가감과 강박증상 ·····································9
1. 자기 지각과 강박증상 ···············································10
2. 자기 양가감 (self ambivalence) ····························11
3. 자기 양가감과 불완전감 ···········································12
제 3절. 침투적 강박사고에 대한 인지평가 ···················13
1. 사고-실재 융합의 정의 ·············································14
2. 사고-실재 융합과 위험회피 ·····································16
제 4절. 문제제기 ·······························································18
제 5절. 연구가설 ································································20

제 3장. 연구 방법 ································································21
제 1절. 연구 대상 ······························································21
제 2절. 측정 도구 ······························································21

제 4장. 연구 결과 ································································25
제 1절. 참여자 인구통계학적 특징 ··································25
제 2절. 척도의 평균(표준편차)과 상관관계····················25
제 3절. 동기적 차원에 따른 강박증상 집단 구분 ··········27
제 4절. 동기적 차원의 강박증상 유형에 따른 자기양가감 차이 ·································································································29
제 5절. 동기적 차원의 강박증상 유형에 따른 사고-실재 융합의 차이 ··································································································30
1. 동기적 차원의 강박증상 유형에 따른 사고-실재 융합의 하위요인 차이 ···································································································31

제 5장. 결론 및 논의 ·····························································32

참고문헌 ················································································38
부 록 ·······················································································44
Degree
Master
Publisher
조선대학교 일반대학원
Citation
강수현. (2016). 동기적 차원의 강박증상에 따른 자기양가감과 사고-실재 융합의 차이: 비임상 집단을 중심으로.
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/13087
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000265992
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > 3. Theses(Master)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
  • Embargo2017-02-21
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.