中國의 反덤핑規制 決定要因과 韓中協力方案 硏究

Abstract

Chinese has joined the WTO in 2001 and after sign up the wto, tariff, quantity regulation, the use of trade protection measures, such as voluntary export restrictions has been strictly limited. China is to significantly increase the number of anti-dumping complaint in order to overcome this situation, trading countries are focusing attention on the fact that China is actively using the anti-dumping measures. In fact, recently the Chinese government has been actively strengthening the anti-dumping complaint against foreign goods being imported into the Chinese market through formal or informal routes and this point came to China as a means of abusing the anti-dumping duty import-competing industries threat protection, and the relative exporter has been raised Despite the increased attention of The world's anti-dumping operations in China, most of the previous research related to China's anti-dumping regime to cease operations are described simple comparison of research institutions and the introduction of China's anti-dumping and anti-dumping relevant international norms and operating status. In this paper, we examine closely the current anti-dumping laws and regulations that the Chinese government's anti-dumping regime based operations. These laws and regulations and consideration of the conformity of the WTO agreements related to norms, and response to China's anti-dumping system operations and analyze the current situation and Korea and reviewed the mutual anti-dumping measures examples of China and analysis for South Korea anti-dumping regulation in the future, China strategy and Korea-China FTA era mutual trade partners and placed a mutual cooperation aimed at presenting such to grow together as partners. This study used a method such as case studies and literature review, mainly in analyzing the Chinese anti-dumping system and its operation features to attain the object of this study to solve the problems of the existing studies. Literature is basically leveraging trade remedy cases related to disputes in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) and leveraging related materials and data, such as the Trade Committee at the same time. Their comparative analysis was carried out in parallel, as well as an empirical study on the strategic effects of the Chinese anti-dumping complaint. This paper consists of the following in order to achieve effective for research purposes. INTRODUCTION Background of the first section part and major research studies, studies of the range and method, and described with respect to the configuration of the paper. Chapter 2, based on the causes and economic impact of anti-dumping regulations for Theoretical Study on Anti-Dumping Regulation and WTO anti-dumping agreement regulating examined the implications and the World Anti-Dumping Regulation trend. Chapter 3, legal basis and operational status and established background and highlights the issue of anti-dumping regulations of China Anti-Dumping Act of China's anti-dumping complaint, China's anti-dumping filing status and characteristics, and Korea-China anti-dumping Regulations domestic and international concepts and measurement methods of previous studies Read through the literature review and analyzed. Chapter 4 was set differentiated perspectives and models and analysis methods based on the study of the theoretical discussions about how previous research, conducted through the collection and analysis of data processing. Finally, Chapter 5 summarizes the findings in the summary and conclusions were generally outlined the limits of the study and future challenges. Features of the effects of the anti-dumping complaint is that China seems to go out the feature to replace the United States and the EU, unlike the threat effect, rather than trade diversion effect appears larger source of income due to a reduction in imports threatens third this effect quickly. These features are suggestive only to South Korea, which established enterprises and government strategies for responding to anti-dumping complaints in China during those can be very large. The summary of the results of the empirical probability of the panel effective negative binomial model mainly described. First, if China's real economic growth of 1% increase in the probability of occurrence of anti-dumping complaints in China was analyzed by decreased about 22.53%. Second, the real unemployment rate in China is 1 percent probability of anti-dumping complaint against China's imported products were analyzed by increased approximately 4.5-fold (450%). Third, if the China yuan versus the US dollar exchange rate is 1% increase in the probability of anti-dumping complaint against China's imported products were analyzed by an increase of about 92.8%. Fourth, when anti-dumping complaint the number of trading partners for China are one thing increases and increased anti-dumping complaint that the probability of 7.2% for the importer of China, if the goods balance of trade partners of China's one deficit there than in the case of a surplus of about 1.75 times (74.5%) were found to increase. Finally, if China is counting on the panel pooling model signed a free trade agreement with the trading partner has been shown to decrease 0.43 times (43.8%) compared with non-member countries. Practical measures to promote cooperation between the two countries signed a Korea-China FTA dumping areas are as follows: First, the anti-dumping investigation in Korea and China is the trade imbalance between the two countries has an important impact. So it was a major challenge to control the industrial structure, and improve the imbalance of both countries. By analyzing the export structure and industrial structure in China to move away from the model of export-oriented past, mainly by converting high-technology and exporter of high value-added products accounted for advantage in a competitive market and lower the likelihood of anti-dumping investigation. That is usually the structure of consuming goods exported by switching to high-technology products is get away from the fundamental friction and differentiate their products and it will require corresponding measures beyond China's dependence on foreign technology. Second, through its investment in South Korea, China should solve the trade deficit problem in China for South Korea. China's trade surplus for Korea in the last 20 years, the export of key components materials industry (ie, the intermediate material) was obtained through. China has expanded the investment and management of raw materials for the middle of South Korea to correct the trade yeokjo for Korea industry (especially in areas that have a competitive advantage over China). In this regard, China needs a policy that is flexible to support foreign investment. In addition, Korea is sustainable through the opening of the industry to invest in China to help improve the competitiveness of industry is to go to China and South Korea national co-existence and development direction. Third, customs regulations to improve protection their countries is required. Korea and China are putting their respective customs regulations for infant industry protection in the country. If these two countries are not properly adjusted tariff protection regulations is a constraint on agricultural development in both countries. South Korea against Chinese goods, especially in the allocation of agricultural products and tariffs, quarantine, etc. on the side of increasing trade barriers against China and China is to impose high tariffs on textiles and clothing, etc. and protect the domestic industry. If this protection is limited to the minimum range of customs regulations leading to the maximum effect and the trade, it is possible to prevent the dumping dispute. Fourth, there is a need to establish a mechanism to exchange market information. Both governments have to realize bilateral industrial and agricultural, manufacturing trade zone information to prevent conflict and build a complementary trade through the network can be exchanged in such a trade organization. Fifth, establish principles and standards of conduct unified anti-dumping law. Korea and China have differences on the detailed provisions of the Anti-Dumping Act. Gap is due to differences in national circumstances and levels of economic and enhancing the skills and imperfections through the adjustment of industrial structure. Korea and China are adhering to the principle of mutual benefit, equality on the basis of trade between the two countries in accordance with the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement and adjust the anti-dumping laws towards that complement the interests of both countries reduced anti-dumping complaint cases is to realize the win-win strategy. Sixth, Korea and China is required to conclude the Anti-Dumping Agreement. When the Anti-Dumping Agreement was signed by the two countries jointly reviewed in detail for specific industries and professional national competition conditions of dumping that occurs frequently by research organizations and convergence of policies and legal opinions between each other to minimize the conflict of the two industries. Seventh, it is necessary to require the training of specialized personnel and to enable the exchange between Korea and China anti-dumping complaint authorities. China's trade volume with South Korea, geographical proximity, industry structure, competition is intensifying in many ways, including, but need to find a way through the mutual development of human exchanges. Finally, the interaction between the mechanism responsible for the Petitions officials has to be increased. Officials in charge of anti-dumping complaint should be required not only to determine the anti-dumping understand the legal knowledge and knowledge of the industry and identify partners also cultural knowledge. Through regular exchanges between officials of increasing mutual understanding it can be solved unilateral trade disputes between the two countries or the anti-dumping complaint.