통합교육 방해요인에 대한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Issued Date
A Study on the Obstacle Factor against Inclusion Education

by Youn-Kyoung Jeon
Advisor : Prof. Nam-Soon Kim
Major in Special Education
Graduate School of Education, Chosun University

The trend of current special education in Korea is pursuing inclusion education for the handicapped with special educational needs irregardless of types or degrees of disabilities like normal students, not a simple physical education for them of the handicapped. One of the important factors to realize successful inclusion education is perception and attitude of general teachers and in particular, it is important to figure out what is an obstacle to inclusion education and to find out a countermeasure. General teachers are positive in ideals and philosophical concepts, but they are still unfamiliar with real situation and consider it as a liability.
Therefore, this study classifies domestic masters' and doctoral theses according to trends, organizes general trends of obstacle factor against inclusion education and identifies countermeasures to overcome the obstacle and factors that should be improved for the handicapped, aiming at developing a successful inclusion education plan. The results of the study are presented as follows:
First, there are a variety of theses on obstacles against inclusion education in 2002s, beginning in 1990s. In particular, the subjects and how to study in current studies are more diversified compared to those of the past, and studies on the obstacle which was just part of inclusion education have been expanded.
Second, as a result of analysing them according to research periods, most of the studies needed one or two months and as the studies which needed more than three months chose qualitative study such as personal interview, they needed more time compared to others. According to the results of analysing the test tools, four studies used existing test tools while 10 developed them for themselves.
Third, the results of analysing test methods show that 2 theses used reliability, 11 used frequency analysis, 10 used t-test, and 9 used ANOVA, which indicates that frequency analysis and difference test were basically used for most of the theses used frequency. For regression analysis, they used regression analysis and general linear regression analysis. Others included χ-test, correlation analysis and ratio analysis.
Fourth, obstacles against inclusion education in 1990s were insufficient attention to inclusion education and deficit in professionalism of general teachers. In 2000s, they were excessive number of students and task per teacher. The obstacles against inclusion education in 2000s were imperfect preparation by teachers and excessive number of students a class. Studies on inclusion education in 1990s reported that the obstacles were negative attitude to the young children with handicap, less legal and institutional regulations, less training on the education for the young children with handicap, and less service and support for the special education. In 2000s, negative attitude to the young children with handicap was the biggest obstacle.
Through the results of this study, main factors drawn as obstacle factors in studies on them in 1990s and 2000s were confirmed. The results were presented as follows: 13 cases of negative perception on the handicap, 10 cases of less professionalism of the general teachers, 9 cases of less attention to inclusion education, 5 cases of less information and facilities, 4 cases of administrative and financial support and 4 cases of excessive task imposed on teachers. Therefore, much attention should be paid to improving negative perception on the handicapped which is the biggest problem. As teachers have much difficulty in instruction of the young children with handicap due to less proper knowledge and preparation, they should be properly trained for inclusion education through prior education and present education on necessary attitude, ability and knowledge for successful inclusion education. And the number of students should be gradually decreased and the number of teachers who can deal with inclusion education should be increased as well.
Alternative Author(s)
Jeon Youn Kyoung
조선대학교 교육대학원 특수교육과
교육대학원 특수교육
Awarded Date
2008. 2
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1. 연구의 의의 1
2. 연구의 목적 4

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
1. 통합교육의 개념과 특성 5
2. 장애아 통합교육의 조건 9
3. 통합교육이 주는 영향 15
4. 통합교육에 대한 교사들의 인식과 역할 19
5. 통합교육의 방해요인 22

Ⅲ. 연구 방법 25
1. 연구 대상의 선정 25
2. 연구 범위와 방법 25

Ⅳ. 연구 내용 27
1. 통합교육 방해요인 관련 연구논문의 전체적인 분석 27
2. 연구 대상 분석 35
3. 연구 방법 분석 36

Ⅴ. 연구 결과 41
1. 통합교육 내 방해요인 인식에 대한 연구결과의 시대별 분석 41
2. 통합교육의 방해요인 인식에 대한 연구결과의 시대별 분석 51
3. 통합교육 및 방해요인 인식에 대한 연구결과의 시대별 분석 53
4.. 방해요인에 관한 전체 논문 분석 56

Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 59
1. 요 약 59
2. 결 론 62
3. 제 언 63

참고문헌 65

부 록 69

표 목 차

통합교육 방해요인 관련 연구 논문 28
1990년대 통합교육 내 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문 (2편) 29
1990년대 통합교육 및 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문 (1편) 29
2000년대 통합교육 내 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문 (9편) 30
2000년대 통합교육의 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문 (2편) 31
2000년대 통합교육 및 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문 (1편) 31
(통합교육의 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문) 발표연도 분석표 32
(통합교육 및 방해요인 인식에 관한 논문) 발표연도 분석표 33
연구유형별 분석표 33
연구영역별 논문 수 34
연구대상별 분석표 35
연구대상자 소속별 분석표 36
연구기간별 분석 37
자료처리에 사용된 검사도구분석 38
자료처리에 사용된 검증방법별 분석표 39
방해요인 도출 분석표 58
조선대학교 교육대학원
전윤경. (2007). 통합교육 방해요인에 대한 연구
Appears in Collections:
Education > Theses(Master)(교육대학원)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
Files in This Item:

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.