CHOSUN

황진이·이매창의 문학 비교 연구

Metadata Downloads
Author(s)
김현정
Issued Date
2005
Abstract
Both Hwang Jin-i and Lee Mae-chang are gee-sang poets in Ye dynasty.
Hwang Jin-i left six poem in shi-jo and seven chinese poetry and all of them have beauty of art. Thus those works have been on the tongues of people until the present.
Lee Mae-chang left poetry of Mae-chang in which a poem in shi-jo and 58 chinese poetry are printed. This graduation theses developed existing studies which was made individually and observed carefully a common point and difference between two of them.
In writing the sorrow of parting and loves, her positive and aggressive self-consciousness is open-heartedly expressed, and a strong minded life of elegant youth also is reflected well.
On the other hand, Lee Mae -chang tried to make a heart pining for an absent love come true in dream and spiritual world, for dream and spiritual world is described as space of hope that keeps his existence.
Aa a result of study on Hwang Jin-i's and Mae -chang's literatures, first, judging from writer's sense represented in subject, we can see that the theme of affection and temptation is mentioned only in Hwang Jin-i's literature and the theme of an immortal thought is mentioned only in Mae -chang's literature and we can find that, for this, Hwang Jin-i expressed her feelings straightly , while Mae-chang used, depending on other objects, metaphorical expressions.
Secondly, judging from a view of the world expressed in works, Hwang Jin-i didn't deplore her destiny of gee-sang, on the contrary, lived her given life as positive as possible . but Having skeptical a view of the world about the life of gee-sang, Mae -chang pathetically sang of her ill-fated destiny in a poem.
Alternative Title
A Comparative Study on the Literature of Hwang Jin-i, and Lee Mae-Chang
Alternative Author(s)
Kim, Hyun-Jung
Affiliation
조선대학교 교육대학원
Department
교육대학원 국어교육
Advisor
김현정
Awarded Date
2005. 8
Table Of Contents
목차
ABSTRACT = ⅱ
Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
1. 연구목적 및 방법 = 1
2. 연구사 = 3
Ⅱ. 황진이 · 이매창의 문학적 배경 = 6
Ⅲ. 황진이 · 이매창의 문학 비교 고찰 = 27
1. 황진이 문학의 특성 = 27
1) 시조 = 27
2) 한시 = 31
2. 이매창 문학의 특성 = 38
1) 시조 = 38
2) 한시 = 39
3. 양자의 문학 비교 고찰 = 54
1) 주제에 나타난 작가 의식 = 54
2) 작품 속에 나타난 세계관 = 56
Ⅳ. 황진이 · 이매창 문학의 문학사적 의의 = 59
Ⅴ. 결론 = 61
참고문헌 = 63
Degree
Master
Publisher
조선대학교 교육대학원
Citation
김현정. (2005). 황진이·이매창의 문학 비교 연구
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://oak.chosun.ac.kr/handle/2020.oak/4421
http://chosun.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000234946
Appears in Collections:
Education > Theses(Master)(교육대학원)
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
Files in This Item:

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.